doc: add table comparing ways to consume capa output#2874
doc: add table comparing ways to consume capa output#2874mike-hunhoff merged 4 commits intomandiant:masterfrom
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @devs6186, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request introduces a new table to doc/usage.md comparing different ways to consume capa output, which is a good addition for user clarity. It also includes a corresponding entry in CHANGELOG.md. The changes are straightforward and improve documentation. No critical issues were found.
|
@devs6186 please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Add a short table to usage.md for CLI, IDA, Ghidra, CAPE, and web. Fixes mandiant#2273
Addresses reviewer feedback to provide a link to learn more for each consumption method (IDA Pro, Ghidra, CAPE, Web/capa Explorer). Refs mandiant#2273
2e3c9aa to
ea88b74
Compare
i have resolved all conflicts for all my ope prs, it waiting for your approval thank you! |
|
@devs6186 please resolve conflicts and we can get this merged. |
Resolve CHANGELOG.md conflict by keeping both the doc entry (mandiant#2273) and the binja entry (mandiant#2399) in the Development section.
closes #2273
Users often ask about the different ways to work with capa results. There was no single place comparing CLI, IDA Pro, Ghidra, CAPE/sandbox, and Web (capa Explorer).
Changes
doc/usage.mdwith a concise table listing: CLI, IDA Pro, Ghidra, CAPE (dynamic sandbox), and Web (capa Explorer) — including the output/interface and typical use for each.Checklist