Skip to content

Remove lib comparison #276

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Remove lib comparison #276

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
11 changes: 0 additions & 11 deletions README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -52,17 +52,6 @@ function App() {

> See the [example](./package/example/Shared) app


### Comparison with other libraries

One library to render 3D content is [expo-gl](https://docs.expo.dev/versions/latest/sdk/gl-view) usually used together with [expo-three](https://www.npmjs.com/package/expo-three). react-native-filament has a few advantages over expo-gl:

- Supports using `glb` files out of the box
- On iOS react-native-filament uses Metal, where expo-gl is using the [deprecated OpenGL ES](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/opengles) apple framework
- The rendering happens on the JS thread for `expo-three`, where react-native-filament uses a separate thread (and filament processes the rendering commands in a pool of different threads)
- filament is battle tested and react-native-filament is used in production apps with millions of users already, proven to be highly stable


### Contributing

We welcome contributions to react-native-filament! 🎉
Expand Down