Skip to content

Conversation

DianaKiyan
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary

Great work! The core requirements are fully met: your Machine hierarchy is correct, each subclass provides clear doWork() and stopWork() implementations, and MainApp properly demonstrates polymorphism by iterating over a Machine[] and invoking both methods.

Minor improvement (non-blocking):

  • In src/main/java/core/basesyntax/Excavator.java and src/main/java/core/basesyntax/Truck.java, add @Override above the doWork() method. This helps the compiler catch signature mismatches and keeps the intent explicit.
    • Example:
      • Line where public void doWork() is declared: add @Override directly above it.

Everything else looks clean and consistent. Nice job on clear messages and adherence to method signatures. Keep it up!


✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Footnotes

  1. Rate AI review example

package core.basesyntax;

public class Excavator extends Machine {
public void doWork() {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The @Override annotation is missing above the doWork() method. While not strictly required for functionality, it is a best practice and helps ensure correct overriding. Consider adding @Override above the doWork() method for consistency and clarity.

package core.basesyntax;

public class Truck extends Machine {
public void doWork() {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The @Override annotation is missing above the doWork() method. While not strictly required for functionality, it is a best practice and helps ensure correct overriding. Consider adding @Override above the doWork() method for consistency and clarity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants