-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 124
Molecule for forcefield #1127
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
yaoyi92
wants to merge
6
commits into
materialsproject:main
Choose a base branch
from
yaoyi92:mol_for_forcefield
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Molecule for forcefield #1127
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7af3143
output ForceFieldStructureTaskDocument or ForceFieldMoleculeTaskDocum…
yaoyi92 18534e0
add from_ase_task_doc func back in ase/schemas.py
yaoyi92 07ffd13
add or ForceFieldMoleculeTaskDocument in the function descriptions
yaoyi92 c040c8e
update ForceFieldTaskDocument to ForceFieldStructureTaskDocument
yaoyi92 95fd127
pick the correct mdareporter version
yaoyi92 fcea4a6
Merge branch 'main' into mol_for_forcefield
JaGeo File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure why this isn't done for all other ForceFieldMakers? There, I only see a replacement with
ForceFieldStructureTaskDocument
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Which makers are you referring to? I only found two makers that have an explicit make function, ForceFieldRelaxMaker and ForceFieldMDMaker. It seems, the other makers inherent from these two.