-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
Logo update #696
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Logo update #696
Conversation
2077af2 to
f0eb73f
Compare
GiovanniCanali
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I’m wondering whether the logo without a background is the best option for GitHub. What are your thoughts, @ndem0, @dario-coscia, @FilippoOlivo?
Code Coverage SummaryResults for commit: f0eb73f Minimum allowed coverage is ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results |
I already thought about this, and I think yes! If you are opening GitHub with Google (which is the main browser) you have a light and dark mode depending if ia day or night. When the browser is in dark mode it is pretty ugly to see the white background |
Agree! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like it!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can make it
|
@FilippoOlivo I tried to make it and rendered the doc, but I don't like it now enough 😂 What do you think? Also @ndem0 @GiovanniCanali
|
Maybe the one without the name is better |
|
It looks cleaner without the name, but I like it in both ways |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR performs a minor version bump and updates image references in the README to use relative paths instead of absolute GitHub URLs.
- Version updated from 0.2.4 to 0.2.5 in pyproject.toml
- Image links in README.md changed from absolute GitHub URLs to relative paths
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| pyproject.toml | Version bump to 0.2.5 |
| README.md | Updated PINA logo links to use relative paths instead of absolute GitHub URLs |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
* update logo * bump version from 0.2.4 to 0.2.5
* update logo * bump version from 0.2.4 to 0.2.5
* update logo * bump version from 0.2.4 to 0.2.5
* update logo * bump version from 0.2.4 to 0.2.5





Description
This PR is related to #695 .
Checklist