CSS

[matheusrocha89]

This PR fixes the exporting styles of the package, adds documentation for the CSS part, and changes the build:

• Removes the test from being built
• Removing map files from dist folder

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation

  • Updated README with clear instructions for CSS import
  • Added guidance on component styling and default styles

• Chores

  • Updated package configuration
    • Modified main entry point
    • Added module and type definition entry points
  • Simplified TypeScript compiler configuration by removing source and declaration maps
  • Updated Vite configuration to exclude test files from type declarations

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces documentation and configuration updates for the @nobrainers/react-click-edit component. The changes focus on clarifying CSS import requirements in the README, updating package entry points in package.json, removing specific TypeScript compiler map generation options, and excluding test files from type declarations. These modifications aim to improve package clarity, module compatibility, and build configuration.

Changes

File	Changes
README.md	Added "CSS Import" section explaining required CSS import for the component
package.json	Updated main entry points: - Changed main to dist/click-edit.umd.js - Added module pointing to dist/click-edit.es.js - Added types referencing dist/index.d.ts
tsconfig.json	Removed compiler options: - declarationMap: true - sourceMap: true
vite.config.ts	Added exclude: ["**/*.test.tsx"] to dts plugin configuration

Possibly related PRs

• Github Workflows #3: Changes to package exports field related to CSS file import and usage

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of code so neat,
Imports and configs, now complete!
CSS in place, types refined,
Our component's docs are now aligned.
Hop, hop, hooray! The changes are sweet! 🎉

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov-commenter]

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 60.44%. Comparing base (df71bc3) to head (3064bbd).

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main       #5   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   60.44%   60.44%           
=======================================
  Files           5        5           
  Lines         134      134           
  Branches       21       21           
=======================================
  Hits           81       81           
  Misses         49       49           
  Partials        4        4           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	60.44% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

README.md (1)

156-172: Consider consolidating repeated CSS import statements.

The CSS import statement appears multiple times in the documentation. Consider:

1. Mentioning it once in the "CSS Import" section
2. Referencing that section in other places where the import is currently repeated

This would make the documentation more maintainable and reduce redundancy.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between df71bc3 and 3064bbd.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• README.md (2 hunks)
• package.json (1 hunks)
• tsconfig.json (0 hunks)
• vite.config.ts (1 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• tsconfig.json

🔇 Additional comments (3)

vite.config.ts (1)

14-14: LGTM! Verify test files exclusion.

Good practice to exclude test files from type declarations. This helps keep the package size optimal and prevents test types from being exposed to consumers.

Let's verify that test files are properly excluded from type declarations:

package.json (1)

5-7: LGTM! Package entry points are well configured.

The package entry points are properly configured for:

• UMD bundle as main entry
• ES module support
• TypeScript declarations

README.md (1)

26-32: LGTM! Clear CSS import documentation.

The CSS import requirement is well documented with a clear example.