add DABEST packages and estimationstats.com

[josesho]

Hi,

Just thought I'd share the visualization and analysis packages we developed. We introduce estimation plots, that display the effect size alongside all data points. We also compute 95% confidence intervals via robust nonparametric bootstrap techniques.

Thanks,
Joses

[petulla]

My own thinking on this is that we should attempt to keep the libraries section limited to toolkits that start at a lower level and try to build up from there rather than tools that set out to solve a narrow problem within a domain or subdomain. Otherwise, that section risks becoming quite unwieldy. @mathisonian

[josesho]

Thanks for your comment. The package is not low-level general-purpose, but I wouldn't say it solves a narrow problem.

I could shift it to another section: SciViz, Stats and Uncertainty, Visual Forms?

[mathisonian]

I haven’t seen this style of plots before. Do you have a link to research or evaluation on the underlying idea? So far we have been keeping the toolkits section relatively general purpose, but I wouldn’t be opposed to adding more structure, R for example has a lot of packages building on academic work that would be nice to include.

…

On Nov 23, 2018, at 10:06 PM, Joses W. Ho ***@***.***> wrote: Thanks for your comment. The package is not low-level general-purpose, but I wouldn't say it solves a narrow problem. I could shift it to another section: SciViz, Stats and Uncertainty, Visual Forms? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[josesho]

We've got a preprint which garnered a large amount of attention from all sorts of researchers: sports scientists, ecologists, microbiologists etc. (The manuscript is currently under review.)

[mathisonian]

Okay thanks @josesho

Let's wait for a peer reviewed citation and then we'll add