Skip to content

Conversation

VAWVAW
Copy link

@VAWVAW VAWVAW commented Oct 11, 2025

According to the spec if a m.fully_read event does not exist, the normal m.read marker should be used as a fallback.

@VAWVAW VAWVAW requested a review from a team as a code owner October 11, 2025 21:43
@VAWVAW VAWVAW requested review from andybalaam and removed request for a team October 11, 2025 21:43
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 11, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.44%. Comparing base (588d604) to head (de65c94).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5772      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.43%   88.44%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         360      360              
  Lines       99796    99805       +9     
  Branches    99796    99805       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits        88250    88273      +23     
+ Misses       7405     7395      -10     
+ Partials     4141     4137       -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Oct 11, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #5772 will not alter performance

Comparing VAWVAW:timeline-fully-read-fallback (de65c94) with main (588d604)

Summary

✅ 50 untouched

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant