Skip to content

Conversation

@Zocker1999NET
Copy link

@Zocker1999NET Zocker1999NET commented Aug 7, 2022

Signed-off-by: Felix Stupp [email protected]

@Zocker1999NET Zocker1999NET changed the title MSCXXXX: User-given nicknames & descriptions for rooms & users MSC3864: User-given nicknames & descriptions for rooms & users Aug 7, 2022
@Zocker1999NET Zocker1999NET force-pushed the room-nicknames branch 2 times, most recently from af872af to 5c36dbc Compare August 7, 2022 15:03
@Zocker1999NET Zocker1999NET changed the title MSC3864: User-given nicknames & descriptions for rooms & users [WIP] MSC3864: User-given nicknames & descriptions for rooms & users Aug 7, 2022
@Zocker1999NET Zocker1999NET marked this pull request as draft August 7, 2022 20:32
@turt2live turt2live added proposal A matrix spec change proposal client-server Client-Server API kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. labels Aug 8, 2022
@turt2live
Copy link
Member

@Zocker1999NET when you get the chance, please Sign Off on your changes.

Zocker1999NET added a commit to Zocker1999NET/matrix-spec-proposals that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2022
user's user-given attributes now defined in
[MSC3865](matrix-org#3865)
@Zocker1999NET Zocker1999NET changed the title [WIP] MSC3864: User-given nicknames & descriptions for rooms & users [WIP] MSC3864: User-given attributes for rooms Aug 9, 2022
@Zocker1999NET
Copy link
Author

I've found another proposal #3015 which may overlap with this one. I will check how both overlap and if, looking at the feature set and way of implementation, one is superior to the other. If so, they may should be merged.

@Mart-Bogdan
Copy link

@Zocker1999NET I think that other proposal is abandoned. So if you would like to continue it would be great.

I agree with comments from discussion on other MSC, abut naming. Perhaps move user_given to the end. Or we can just leave it as is: m.user_given.user.displayname .

What do you think? I guess we need to resume discussion in room you've created: #mscs-3015-3864-3865:matrix.org

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

client-server Client-Server API kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. proposal A matrix spec change proposal

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants