Skip to content

Conversation

@Alb33rt
Copy link
Contributor

@Alb33rt Alb33rt commented Nov 1, 2025

Changes Made

  • Changed configurations to work on ros2 instead.
  • Added random walk and random simulations to the IMU

Rationale/Other Solutions Considered

  • Improves the accuracy of the simulation environment

Tests Done

  • Tested using AUV-2026, streaming data to the docker container
  • Utilized Foxglove to verify the movement of the noise.

@Alb33rt Alb33rt changed the title Ros2 Add: ROS2 Support and IMU Random Noise Nov 1, 2025
Copy link

@WilliamZhang2205 WilliamZhang2205 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From what I remember, you told me the DVL would also rely on the RandomWalk. I think itd be better to have a random walk and generate Noise as helper methods for all sensors that take parameters for the noise of specific sensors. Is that doable?

Theory wise Imma need you to explain it to me but I trust the math you did. Surface level review looks sensible.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants