Ff111 More OPFS related updaes #19056
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
the
data:api
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When doing this kind of check, I highly recommend searching for the pref in searchfox inside dom/webidl: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/search?q=dom.fs.enabled&path=dom%2Fwebidl&case=true®exp=false
Per the result DataTransferItem and Window members are not covered (as they are not part of https://fs.spec.whatwg.org/)
And it seems spec_urls are missing too, can you add them while you are at it?
hamishwillee
force-pushed
the
ff111_opfsfilestuff
branch
from
641ccc0 to
96666bb
Compare
|
Hi @saschanaz Thanks so much - good tip on the searchfox.
The APIs now covered appear to have a spec-urls unless they are non-standard - such as I think we're good. |
| "move": { | ||
| "__compat": { | ||
| "mdn_url": "https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/API/FileSystemHandle/move", | ||
| "support": { | ||
| "chrome": { | ||
| "version_added": false | ||
| }, | ||
| "chrome_android": "mirror", | ||
| "edge": "mirror", | ||
| "firefox": { | ||
| "version_added": "111" | ||
| }, | ||
| "firefox_android": "mirror", | ||
| "ie": { | ||
| "version_added": false | ||
| }, | ||
| "oculus": "mirror", | ||
| "opera": "mirror", | ||
| "opera_android": "mirror", | ||
| "safari": { | ||
| "version_added": false | ||
| }, | ||
| "safari_ios": "mirror", | ||
| "samsunginternet_android": "mirror", | ||
| "webview_android": "mirror" | ||
| }, | ||
| "status": { | ||
| "experimental": true, | ||
| "standard_track": false, | ||
| "deprecated": false | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@queengooborg FYI support for this was added in FF111 in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1811001. However appears to be explicitly non-standard at this point as it is in a "PR" state - see the big banner when you access the URL https://whatpr.org/fs/10.html#api-filesystemhandle
Upshot, I've added it because that makes the compatibility story easier to track later, but there is no spec URL and it is marked as experimental and non-standard.
@saschanaz Added with above caveats ^^^. I don't plan to add documentation for this right now; any idea on when this PR is likely to go in?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have no idea, maybe @janvarga knows?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@saschanaz - cool - not urgent - just useful so we get a ping when it becomes standard.
BTW, thanks for all your help and advice on this. I will do better next time.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No problem, you're welcome 👍
|
@queengooborg I think this can merge now. |
FF111 added support for OPFS in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1811001. I added the main API in #18907 but it never occurred to me that the rest of the file system around this was not supported. So as per https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1811001#c11 this updates the interfaces in the File System Access API to indicate they are also supported.
Note, WritableStream is already marked as supported from FF100
@saschanaz Can you confirm this issue delivers full support for the API / that this is the right set of things to mark as supported in FF111?