Firefox 148 nightly-only support for Document Picture-in-Picture API #28849
+20
−10
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
data:api
chrisdavidmills
changed the title
Contributor
|
Tip: Review these changes grouped by change (recommended for most PRs), or grouped by feature (for large PRs). |
8 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Firefox 148 adds support for the Document Picture-in-Picture API: see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1858562.
We support all features except for the
DocumentPictureInPicture/requestWindow()disallowReturnToOpeneroption; see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1858562#c21.The feature is available by default in Nightly only. In non-Nightly 148+ Firefox, you can enable it via the
dom.documentpip.enabledpref. I wasn't sure if I should include the pref information in the BCD, or just include it in the Experimental features writeup...?Test results and supporting details
Related issues