Skip to content

Conversation

@Abdul-Microsoft
Copy link
Contributor

Purpose

  • This pull request introduces updates to role assignment configurations in Azure Resource Manager templates to explicitly specify the principalType as ServicePrincipal. This change ensures clarity and consistency when defining role assignments.

Updates to role assignment configurations:

Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Golden Path Validation

  • I have tested the primary workflows (the "golden path") to ensure they function correctly without errors.

Deployment Validation

  • I have validated the deployment process successfully and all services are running as expected with this change.

What to Check

Verify that the following are valid

  • ...

Other Information

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This pull request adds explicit principalType specification to Azure role assignment configurations to improve clarity and consistency when working with service principals.

  • Adds principalType: 'ServicePrincipal' property to role assignment resources
  • Updates both Bicep template and compiled JSON ARM template
  • Ensures consistent specification of principal type across infrastructure definitions

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
infra/deploy_foundry_role_assignment.bicep Added principalType property to the roleAssignmentToFoundry resource
infra/main.json Updated two role assignment property blocks to include principalType specification

@Prajwal-Microsoft Prajwal-Microsoft merged commit a8af9fd into main Jul 22, 2025
8 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.7.1 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants