fix: removed the condition from docker login step #87
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Roopan-Microsoft
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2025
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 1.2.6 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
blessing-msft
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2025
fix: removed the condition from docker login step
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
This pull request includes a change to the
.github/workflows/docker-build-and-push.ymlfile to simplify the workflow conditions for logging into the Azure Container Registry.Workflow simplification:
.github/workflows/docker-build-and-push.yml: Removed the conditional statement for logging into the Azure Container Registry, which previously checked if the event name was 'push' and the branch was 'main', 'dev', 'demo', or 'hotfix'.Does this introduce a breaking change?