Skip to content

Conversation

@kevin-b-lockwood
Copy link
Contributor

@kevin-b-lockwood kevin-b-lockwood commented Oct 31, 2024

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary

Upgrade required for libimobiledevice upgrade.

Requires #10884, #10898

Build/Dependency Information

Please build the following packages with libusbmuxd:
libimobiledevice-glue

Change Log
  • Upgrade libplist to 2.6.0
  • Add libimobiledevice-glue
  • Upgrade libplist to 2.6.0
  • Upgrade libuxbmuxd to 2.1.0-1
Does this affect the toolchain?

NO

Test Methodology
  • Local build

@kevin-b-lockwood kevin-b-lockwood requested review from a team as code owners October 31, 2024 22:47
@kevin-b-lockwood kevin-b-lockwood force-pushed the kevin-b-lockwood/libusbmuxd-2.1.0-1 branch from 33f4026 to e6f2af1 Compare October 31, 2024 23:01
@reubeno reubeno added the specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED label Nov 22, 2024
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added Packaging 3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 labels Jan 9, 2025
@0xba1a 0xba1a closed this Mar 7, 2025
@0xba1a 0xba1a reopened this Mar 7, 2025
@0xba1a
Copy link
Contributor

0xba1a commented Mar 7, 2025

@kevin-b-lockwood Please update licenses file

Copy link
Contributor

@0xba1a 0xba1a left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Waiting for licenses.json file update for newly added package

@kevin-b-lockwood kevin-b-lockwood force-pushed the kevin-b-lockwood/libusbmuxd-2.1.0-1 branch from e6f2af1 to 1c9132b Compare March 7, 2025 21:13
@kevin-b-lockwood kevin-b-lockwood requested a review from 0xba1a March 7, 2025 21:14
Copy link
Contributor

@kgodara912 kgodara912 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good for next stage: buddy build pipeline.

@kgodara912
Copy link
Contributor

You already have a dedicated PR: #10898 for adding libimobiledevice-glue to the EXTENDED-SPECS, could you please remove that from this PR and resolve merge conflict. Once that PR is merged, we will merge this.

@kevin-b-lockwood kevin-b-lockwood force-pushed the kevin-b-lockwood/libusbmuxd-2.1.0-1 branch from 1c9132b to f53f2d8 Compare June 9, 2025 19:19
@kevin-b-lockwood
Copy link
Contributor Author

Normally I don't like to force push after a patchset has been reviewed, but I felt it was the best way to drop the duplicate commits from #10898. Should be good to go.

@sandeepkarambelkar
Copy link
Contributor

Waiting for work on #10898 to be closed.

@sandeepkarambelkar
Copy link
Contributor

@kevin-b-lockwood, Can you rebase and focus on this now since #10898 is merged now.

@v-aaditya
Copy link
Contributor

A new PR #14876 has been created for upgrading libusbmuxd version to 2.1.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 Packaging specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants