Adjust the conflict package name for mlnx-ofa_kernel-hwe-modules

[ellie-di]

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

• The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
• The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
• Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
• Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
• Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
• All package sources are available
• cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
• LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
• All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
• sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
• Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
• Ready to merge

---

Summary

What does the PR accomplish, why was it needed?
This issue has blocked the September release, due to the following conflict issue.

tdnf install mlnx-ofa_kernel-hwe-modules

1. package mlnx-ofa_kernel-hwe-modules-24.10-23_6.12.50.2.1.azl3.aarch64 conflicts with mlnx-ofa_kernel provided by mlnx-ofa_kernel-24.10-21_6.6.104.2.4.azl3.aarch64
   Found 1 problem(s) while resolving

Does this affect the toolchain?

NO

Associated issues

• fixes https://microsoft.visualstudio.com/OS/_workitems/edit/59918858

Test Methodology

• Pipeline build id: xxxx

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR fixes a package conflict issue that blocked the September release by correcting the conflict package name from mlnx-ofa_kernel to mlnx-ofa_kernel-modules in the mlnx-ofa_kernel-hwe-modules-signed spec file.

Key changes:

• Updated the Conflicts directive to reference the correct package name that accurately represents the conflicting package

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[christopherco]

I couldn't find it, but is there the same Conflicts: in the mlnx-ofa_kernel-hwe spec where the -modules subpackage is being defined?
The expectation in all of the signed specs are to match 1-to-1 in Provides/Requires/Obsoletes/Files with their unsigned counterparts, so the -signed version is a direct replacement.