Fix "No Detail" Use Cases for Legacy and Generational ZGC logging

[jlittle-ptc]

Re-did the changes from PR #440 after a conflicting PR was brought in first.

Specifically, this PR addresses the following use cases:

Log lines from a Java 17/21 Legacy ZGC log without details (no gc*)

[0.038s][info][gc] Using The Z Garbage Collector
[1.810s][info][gc] GC(0) Garbage Collection (Metadata GC Threshold) 122M(2%)->66M(1%)
[2.429s][info][gc] GC(1) Garbage Collection (Metadata GC Threshold) 150M(2%)->96M(1%)
[4.339s][info][gc] GC(2) Garbage Collection (Metadata GC Threshold) 348M(4%)->72M(1%)
[26.051s][info][gc] GC(3) Garbage Collection (Warmup) 816M(10%)->128M(2%)

Log lines from Java 21 (Generational) GC Log without details:

[4.252s][info][gc] GC(2) Major Collection (Metadata GC Threshold)
[4.366s][info][gc] GC(2) Major Collection (Metadata GC Threshold) 384M(5%)->186M(2%) 0.114s
[36.326s][info][gc] GC(3) Major Collection (Warmup)
[36.423s][info][gc] GC(3) Major Collection (Warmup) 730M(9%)->258M(3%) 0.097s

[jlittle-ptc]

Just checking that this will be merged at some point? I really don't want to have to redo them a second time if another breaking change makes it in first :)

[dsgrieve]

@d3r3kk @karianna

[karianna]

Whitespace is slightly out

[karianna]

Nitpcik, but I have a slight preference for putting that logic into a function that effectively says what you said in the comment. e.g. Not the hill I'm going to die on though :-)

// Comment
if (noMemorySummary()) {
....

[karianna]

@jlittle-ptc Apologies, PR LGTM, just some small nitpicks