Skip to content

Conversation

@joexue
Copy link

@joexue joexue commented May 20, 2025

Summary of the Pull Request

Let WT supports tmux control mode

References and Relevant Issues

#3656

Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments

Screenshot 2025-05-13 232209

Support:

  • Create/attach tmux session

  • Split pane vertical/horizontal

  • Window/panes size change

  • Remove pane/tab if remote pane exit or window exit

Improvements may do:

  • Merge the tmux menus/button with existing menu/button
  • Add the keyboard accelerators for tmux menus
  • Unicode support(the VTParser just pass part of characters in DCS mode
  • When attached a session, focus on the same focused tab/pane when detaching(backend is done, need to do some work frontend)
  • Test code

Tested by using tmux 3.4:
ssh to a machine has tmux or use wsl, then run
"tmux -CC" or "tmux -CC a"

Validation Steps Performed

PR Checklist

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added Issue-Feature Complex enough to require an in depth planning process and actual budgeted, scheduled work. Area-Extensibility A feature that would ideally be fulfilled by us having an extension model. Area-Interop Communication between processes Area-UserInterface Issues pertaining to the user interface of the Console or Terminal Product-Terminal The new Windows Terminal. labels May 20, 2025
@joexue

This comment was marked as outdated.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@joexue

This comment was marked as outdated.

@joexue

This comment was marked as outdated.

@joexue
Copy link
Author

joexue commented May 20, 2025

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree

@DHowett
Copy link
Member

DHowett commented May 20, 2025

whoa

@iDarshan
Copy link

This is a long-awaited feature! Thanks @joexue!

@BinaryShrub
Copy link

gif

@DHowett
Copy link
Member

DHowett commented May 23, 2025

FYI: I am working with reduced staffing at the moment, so reviews may be slow to come. I apologize for that.

@iDarshan
Copy link

iDarshan commented Jun 3, 2025

Is there a nightly build with this PR to test?

@carlos-zamora
Copy link
Member

Is there a nightly build with this PR to test?

Your best bet is to build this locally. Once it merges, it will be available on the Canary channel though.

@iDarshan
Copy link

iDarshan commented Jun 6, 2025

Is there a nightly build with this PR to test?

Your best bet is to build this locally. Once it merges, it will be available on the Canary channel though.

I tried to find the build guide, but couldn't find one. Do you have the link handy?

@joexue
Copy link
Author

joexue commented Jun 6, 2025

Is there a nightly build with this PR to test?

Your best bet is to build this locally. Once it merges, it will be available on the Canary channel though.

I tried to find the build guide, but couldn't find one. Do you have the link handy?

README.md ->Developer Guidance @iDarshan

@carlos-zamora
Copy link
Member

Hi @joexue! Thanks for doing this! I published a build for the team to test internally and we've got a few notes we want to share with you 😊

  • Notes/Reactions:
    • Settings menu item is gone from the dropdown
    • It makes your existing window a special "tmux only" window; it disables the menu, but it doesn't disable the key bindings, so you can still split in non-tmux panes
    • Scrollbars are gone? I guess scrolling is server side
  • Requested changes:
    • [Bug] can't type in an older pane after splitting panes
    • tmux tabs should not be draggable into a new window
    • Add a setting to Profile > "Terminal Emulation" page that disables this (it should be disabled by default)
    • Bug: Closing a tab/pane will not kill the instance on the server side
    • Add a feature flag to features.xml (Guidance)
    • [Architectural notes] We should see if we can't just model a tmux pane as a connection so we don't need to pump output into the terminal from the App layer

Overall, this is a really exciting feature and we're excited to see it land! Let us know if you need any guidance or additional comments on any of the thoughts above. 😊

CC @DHowett @lhecker @zadjii-msft

@joexue
Copy link
Author

joexue commented Jun 12, 2025

Hi @joexue! Thanks for doing this! I published a build for the team to test internally and we've got a few notes we want to share with you 😊

  • Notes/Reactions:

    • Settings menu item is gone from the dropdown
    • It makes your existing window a special "tmux only" window; it disables the menu, but it doesn't disable the key bindings, so you can still split in non-tmux panes
    • Scrollbars are gone? I guess scrolling is server side

Scrollbars are gone is by design, I put the comment in the code, since we want to make local panes size match remote(tmux) panes size, but each split, tmux just lost 1 character to use it as separator, if we have side scrollbars, we cannot make two side's size match. To meet this, the padding size is changed too.

As the menu, it is because I tried to touch as less code as I can to do the job. So give the tmux a separate UI system. I described in the PR, this could be improved and should integrated into the present UI/menu system.
But, I think we can skip this ugly stage, directly change the code to make the tmux control mode work with present UI/menu system. I will address this, those +button/flyout splitting menus specifically for tmux will be gone.

  • Requested changes:

    • [Bug] can't type in an older pane after splitting panes

I did not see this bug, to help me to reproduce it here, could you describe your env? how do you connect to tmux server? what is the tmux version?

  • tmux tabs should not be draggable into a new window

Sure, let me fix it.

  • Add a setting to Profile > "Terminal Emulation" page that disables this (it should be disabled by default)

Sure, let me look it.

  • Bug: Closing a tab/pane will not kill the instance on the server side

This is by design, remote pane should close by quit it's app. but this is arguable, if we think close local pane should close remote pane too, it is easy and feasible.

  • Add a feature flag to features.xml (Guidance)

Sure. Fair enough.

  • [Architectural notes] We should see if we can't just model a tmux pane as a connection so we don't need to pump output into the terminal from the App layer

Please provide the idea, I can try to implement it.

Overall, this is a really exciting feature and we're excited to see it land! Let us know if you need any guidance or additional comments on any of the thoughts above. 😊

CC @DHowett @lhecker @zadjii-msft

Thanks!

Since this PR is a bit big, another option is we split it into two or three parts to make it easy to review and integrate. Such as
part 1: infra libs(parser, TermControl, Terminal, ControlCore)
part 2: TmuxControl
part 3: integrating and UI/Menu

What do you think, split it or just keep as it is?

@joexue
Copy link
Author

joexue commented Jun 17, 2025

@carlos-zamora @DHowett @lhecker @zadjii-msft
All comments are addressed, please try again.

Thanks

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@joexue joexue force-pushed the tmux_cc_pr branch 2 times, most recently from 54c2bac to 4817698 Compare June 20, 2025 01:35
@lhecker
Copy link
Member

lhecker commented Dec 15, 2025

I have now pushed my changes and would love to hear your opinion. You don't have to filter yourself obviously. I don't believe my changes are technically correct, but I think it works as least as well as it did before. I tried fixing all bugs and issues that I could find and left notes for anything else.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

@DHowett DHowett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review comments for @lhecker - 42/67 files completed!

</data>
</root>
<data name="TmuxControlInfo" xml:space="preserve">
<value>Running in tmux control mode; Press 'q' to detach:</value>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We may need to {Lock...} the word tmux in some of these. We also historically made the q an insert from another resource (so that in German for example the Azure Connection can say "Enter Ja/nein [J/n]"

const auto newTabClickRevoker = std::move(_newTabClickRevoker);
auto& page = _page;

{
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm... can you *this={} somehow?

TerminalOutput.raise(fmt::format(PreviewText, _displayPowerlineGlyphs ? PromptTextPowerline : PromptTextPlain));
const auto prompt = _displayPowerlineGlyphs ? PromptTextPowerline : PromptTextPlain;
const auto text = fmt::format(FMT_COMPILE(PreviewText), prompt);
TerminalOutput.raise(winrt_wstring_to_array_view(text));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

well that's unfortunate that one of these functions became throwing

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fmt::format can throw though. Marking it as noexcept is akschually technically incorrect. 🤓

{
// Do we ever get here (= uninitialized terminal)? If so: How?
assert(false);
// Yes, we can get here, when do Pane._Split, it need to call _SetupEntranceAnimation^M
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you have some trailing ^Ms here!

if (_control)
{
_responseBuffer.append(L"\r\n");
_control.InjectTextAtCursor(_responseBuffer);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should go through the Connection, shouldn't it? If not, document why not

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like if we successfully route everything through the connection, we don't need InjectTextAtCursor

but also I understand that we need a way to put the "Press Q" message into the originating control...

Copy link
Member

@lhecker lhecker Dec 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should go through the Connection, shouldn't it? If not, document why not

The connection in this case is the OG tmux one. It's currently in the OSC state and so we can't inject text through the connection. It would just come back to us.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A way I used to consider is using delimiters to distinguish the text goes to tmux or local terminal, but in that case, performance is an issue. That why I used a weird callback to do so.
BTW, I saw a needs-author-feedback label on this PR, I’m not sure if that means me, if so, I’m on a trip, plus I have left the context for long time, please let @lhecker completely take over it. I like your change.👍

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added Needs-Author-Feedback The original author of the issue/PR needs to come back and respond to something and removed Needs-Author-Feedback The original author of the issue/PR needs to come back and respond to something labels Dec 16, 2025
@DHowett
Copy link
Member

DHowett commented Dec 18, 2025

@joexue Yep, don't worry about the Needs-Author-Feedback. Even if the PR gets automatically closed.

As long as you keep your fork up, and your branch open, we prefer to work on your PR like this.

That way, you get credit for doing the bulk of the work -- and we can thank you appropriately when it ships. We would literally not have started on this without you. :)

@DHowett
Copy link
Member

DHowett commented Dec 18, 2025

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s).

@lhecker
Copy link
Member

lhecker commented Jan 6, 2026

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s).

@lhecker
Copy link
Member

lhecker commented Jan 6, 2026

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s).

@lhecker
Copy link
Member

lhecker commented Jan 13, 2026

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Area-Extensibility A feature that would ideally be fulfilled by us having an extension model. Area-Interop Communication between processes Area-UserInterface Issues pertaining to the user interface of the Console or Terminal Issue-Feature Complex enough to require an in depth planning process and actual budgeted, scheduled work. Product-Terminal The new Windows Terminal. zBugBash-Consider

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add support for tmux Control Mode

7 participants