Skip to content

Conversation

@marabooy
Copy link
Contributor

Schema sync 2025-04-15 from 1.3.719.0

@marabooy marabooy requested a review from a team as a code owner April 15, 2025 20:14
@musale musale merged commit 6c5d0b8 into master Apr 16, 2025
20 checks passed
@musale musale deleted the schemas/metadata-publishing-2025-04-15 branch April 16, 2025 08:27
@baywet
Copy link
Member

baywet commented Apr 16, 2025

@musale before merging, did you validate why the following things have been removed from v1 which is going to cause breaking changes left and right???

Microsoft.Graph.Security:

additionalDataOptions

  • advancedIndexing
  • listAttachments
  • htmlTranscripts
  • messageConversationExpansion
  • locationsWithoutHits
  • allItemsInFolder

additionalOptions

  • htmlTranscripts
  • advancedIndexing
  • allItemsInFolder
  • includeFolderAndPath
  • condensePaths
  • friendlyName
  • splitSource
  • optimizedPartitionSize
  • includeReport

cloudAttachmentVersion

(the whole Enum)

documentVersion

(the whole Enum)

exportFileStructure

  • msg

exportOptions

  • splitSource
  • includeFolderAndPath
  • friendlyName
  • condensePaths
  • optimizedPartitionSize

itemsToInclude

(the whole Enum)

statisticsOptions

expected, regression from a couple of weeks ago

ediscoveryAddToReviewSetOperation

  • additionalDataOptions
  • cloudAttachmentVersion
  • documentVersion
  • itemsToInclude

ediscoverySearchExportOperation

  • cloudAttachmentVersion
  • documentVersion

addToReviewSet (action)

  • itemsToInclude
  • cloudAttachmentVersion
  • documentVersion

exportReport (action)

  • cloudAttachmentVersion
  • documentVersion

exportResult (action)

  • cloudAttachmentVersion
  • documentVersion

@baywet
Copy link
Member

baywet commented Apr 16, 2025

After tracing things down internally, it was caused by this PR. https://dev.azure.com/msazure/One/_git/AD-AggregatorService-Workloads/pullrequest/12106880

@baywet
Copy link
Member

baywet commented Apr 16, 2025

After some more spelunking, this was only recently introduced with #801. So a "regression" is expected here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants