-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 195
Add example for multi-analyzer #1735
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: yhmo <[email protected]>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: yhmo The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Summary of ChangesHello @yhmo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a comprehensive example demonstrating Milvus's multi-analyzer capabilities, which are crucial for handling diverse textual data, especially in multilingual contexts. It provides a clear guide on how to set up different text processing pipelines for a single field and apply them dynamically during data insertion and search operations. Additionally, a minor refactoring was performed in an existing example to enhance code clarity. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new example for the multi-analyzer feature and refactors an existing example to use constants, which is a good improvement. The new example is well-structured and demonstrates the feature effectively. I've provided a couple of suggestions to enhance the code quality of the new example file: one to address a potential resource leak by using a try-with-resources statement, and another to replace the use of double-brace initialization, which is considered an anti-pattern, with a more modern and safer approach.
No description provided.