Skip to content

Attempt at SIGTERM handling#58

Open
redhotpenguin wants to merge 2 commits intomiyagawa:masterfrom
redhotpenguin:master
Open

Attempt at SIGTERM handling#58
redhotpenguin wants to merge 2 commits intomiyagawa:masterfrom
redhotpenguin:master

Conversation

@redhotpenguin
Copy link

I found that Starman doesn't handle SIGTERM signals which are sent by default from the kill executable. I've made an attempt at adding this support to Starman. I don't have an environment available to test this (we found the issue on an integration server that our Ops team manages), but took a shot at adding this support.

@jeteve
Copy link

jeteve commented Sep 2, 2014

Hi there, we kind of need that for one of our application. Any chance it gets merged soon?

@miyagawa
Copy link
Owner

miyagawa commented Sep 2, 2014

Well this is a compatibility issue, and not sure what we can do about it without breaking the users who uses the TERM signals to do what it does today.

Can you step back and explain what problem you're trying to solve?

@jeteve
Copy link

jeteve commented Sep 2, 2014

Ha sorry, I didn't realize TERM was already handled for something else.

Ref: https://metacpan.org/pod/distribution/Starman/script/starman

Thanks for your prompt answer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants