Skip to content

Conversation

@jymchng
Copy link

@jymchng jymchng commented Nov 22, 2025

Hi

Thank you for maintaining this list.

I would like to introduce fastapi-shield.

Proposal: Add fastapi-shield to the 'Third-Party Extensions / Auth' section

I propose adding the library fastapi-shield to the "Third-Party Extensions" section, specifically under a relevant category like "Auth" or "Utils," as it significantly enhances request pre-processing and authorization patterns in FastAPI.

Project Details

Project Name: fastapi-shield

Repository Link: https://github.com/jymchng/fastapi-shield

Description: A library that introduces the "Shield" pattern, allowing for clean, layered dependency-based request guarding (like permissions, rate limits, or auth checks) before endpoints are executed.

Key Advantages for FastAPI Users

fastapi-shield provides a clear and powerful way to separate authorization and utility logic from endpoint business logic, offering three main advantages:

Truly Reusable Decorators: It allows complex dependency injection logic to be encapsulated into simple, declarative decorators (@shield) that can be applied to any endpoint or router. This abstracts away repetitive authorization checks, making endpoint code cleaner.

Clear Separation of Concerns: By moving the authorization/guarding logic entirely into the @shield decorated function and out of the endpoint function, it strictly separates request handling from business execution. This drastically improves endpoint readability and unit testability.

Lazy Injection of Dependencies: A core feature is that the dependencies required by the endpoint's business logic are only injected if and only if all applied shields (i.e., decorators) do not block the request. If a shield fails (e.g., permission denied), the dependency chain for the endpoint is immediately terminated, improving efficiency and resource usage.

We believe this pattern is a valuable addition to the FastAPI ecosystem, particularly for complex, permission-driven applications.

Thank you for considering the inclusion!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant