Skip to content

Conversation

@johnslavik
Copy link
Member

@johnslavik johnslavik commented Jul 13, 2025

Closes #296, a follow-up to mkdocstrings/mkdocstrings#671.
In this PR, I'm installing mkdocstrings from the mkdocstrings/mkdocstrings#774 PR to build upon the pending feature.
As soon as it's merged, I'll revert d57c79c.

@johnslavik
Copy link
Member Author

Please LMK what tests we could add here @pawamoy.

@johnslavik
Copy link
Member Author

johnslavik commented Jul 13, 2025

@johnslavik
Copy link
Member Author

@pawamoy Revert d57c79c and bump mkdocstrings version before merging! :)

@johnslavik johnslavik marked this pull request as ready for review July 16, 2025 06:17
Copy link
Member

@pawamoy pawamoy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

Copy link
Member

@pawamoy pawamoy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM again! 🚀

@pawamoy pawamoy merged commit e82c24f into main Aug 7, 2025
35 of 53 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

feature: Support data-skip-inventory from upstream

3 participants