Skip to content

Conversation

@pgmpablo157321
Copy link
Contributor

@pgmpablo157321 pgmpablo157321 commented Apr 22, 2025

Fix #2173 Fix #2174

@pgmpablo157321 pgmpablo157321 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 22, 2025 15:51
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 22, 2025

MLCommons CLA bot All contributors have signed the MLCommons CLA ✍️ ✅

@pgmpablo157321 pgmpablo157321 force-pushed the open_checker_fix branch 3 times, most recently from 89faf3d to fff3e42 Compare April 29, 2025 14:25
@swasson488
Copy link

Kenneth Leach: How does the change for checking accuracy affect the accuracy check run time?

Pablo: It shouldn't. Currently, accuracy check runs over the whole data set. Last time, some accuracy tests weren't done for the whole data set, and the submission checker didn't catch it. This check avoids that oversight. Shouldn't change the time to run if you've been doing that correctly. We've run it against prior submissions, and they all pass.

@pgmpablo157321 pgmpablo157321 merged commit cc7d6d8 into master May 20, 2025
19 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 20, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

4 participants