Skip to content

Conversation

AishwaryaKalloli
Copy link
Contributor

Handles message type Exception in lowlevel/server.py _handle_message function.
Right now I am sending a error log if parameter raise_exception=False.
Initital commit, need feedback.

Motivation and Context

Addressing a TODO mentioned in the code, handling one of the unhandled types of message in server.

How Has This Been Tested?

Initial commit, testing pending, need feedback to move ahead.

Breaking Changes

Does not break existing flow. Since the method raises exception it will break the code in case of exception, however it is expected behaviour.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

@AishwaryaKalloli
Copy link
Contributor Author

AishwaryaKalloli commented May 22, 2025

@Kludex I came across TODO mentioned in src/mcp/lowlevel/server.py by you while reading the code.

Would appreciate feedback on how to handle the exception. Since there is no request attached to the message I have sent a log notification response to the client with the error message.
Please let me know if it looks good.

@felixweinberger felixweinberger self-assigned this Jul 15, 2025
@felixweinberger felixweinberger self-requested a review July 15, 2025 12:14
felixweinberger added a commit to AishwaryaKalloli/python-sdk that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2025
- Handle exceptions in match statement as suggested by TODO
- Use proper dict structure for error logging instead of ErrorData
- Add comprehensive tests with parameterization
- Include exception type, module, and args in log data

Reported-by: AishwaryaKalloli
Github-Issue: modelcontextprotocol#786
felixweinberger added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2025
- Handle exceptions in match statement as suggested by TODO
- Use proper dict structure for error logging instead of ErrorData
- Add comprehensive tests with parameterization
- Include exception type, module, and args in log data

Reported-by: AishwaryaKalloli
Github-Issue: #786
@felixweinberger
Copy link
Contributor

felixweinberger commented Jul 15, 2025

@AishwaryaKalloli thanks for your contribution!

Made some tweaks on top of your branch + rebased + added some test cases for exception handling. I don't think we should be using JSONRPC types for log messages, so changed this to a literal dict.

@felixweinberger felixweinberger requested review from Kludex and ihrpr and removed request for felixweinberger July 15, 2025 13:48
gspencergoog pushed a commit to gspencergoog/mcp-python-sdk that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2025
…-h5-and-h6-styles-globally

Apply `h5` and `h6` styles to all content
@felixweinberger felixweinberger requested a review from a team as a code owner August 21, 2025 14:44
AishwaryaKalloli and others added 4 commits August 21, 2025 15:46
- Handle exceptions in match statement as suggested by TODO
- Use proper dict structure for error logging instead of ErrorData
- Add comprehensive tests with parameterization
- Include exception type, module, and args in log data

Reported-by: AishwaryaKalloli
Github-Issue: modelcontextprotocol#786
Changed exception data format to match Python's __exit__ format:
- exception_type: The exception class name
- exception_value: The exception message/value
- exception_traceback: The traceback (set to None for now)

Updated tests to verify the new data format.
Added proper type hints for parametrized test function parameters to resolve pyright errors.
Use modern type[Exception] annotation instead of deprecated typing.Type.
@felixweinberger
Copy link
Contributor

@Kludex ready for another look

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants