Skip to content

Conversation

slisson
Copy link
Member

@slisson slisson commented Sep 13, 2025

No description provided.

@slisson slisson force-pushed the feature/history-pagination branch from 2d65b8c to d198e83 Compare September 13, 2025 12:15
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 13, 2025

Test Results

  231 files    231 suites   45m 28s ⏱️
1 303 tests 1 294 ✅ 9 💤 0 ❌
1 313 runs  1 304 ✅ 9 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 0ab3554.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@slisson slisson force-pushed the feature/history-pagination branch from d198e83 to ebfcfb4 Compare September 13, 2025 17:24
…ered

The Reaktive based implementation had the semantics of flatMapUnordered while all other
implementations had the one of flatMapOrdered.
@slisson slisson force-pushed the feature/history-pagination branch from ebfcfb4 to 8a30490 Compare September 13, 2025 17:52
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 15, 2025

JVM coverage report

Overall Project 58.52% -0.31%
Files changed 77.59%

File Coverage
HistoryIndexNode.kt 89.31% -10.69% 🍏
ModelClientGraph.kt 88.44% -0.65%
ModelClientV2.kt 82.88% -5.69%
ModelReplicationServer.kt 78.41% -0.28% 🍏
RepositoriesManager.kt 77.88% -0.5% 🍏
AsyncNode.kt 75.22% 🍏
SequenceStreamBuilder.kt 71.43% 🍏
DeferredStreamBuilder.kt 65.8% 🍏
IStream.kt 46.72% -2.56%
EmptyStream.kt 46.15% 🍏
ReaktiveStreamBuilder.kt 42.86% -1.28%
SequenceAsStream.kt 41.77% 🍏
SingleValueStream.kt 35.6% 🍏
IModelClientV2.kt 32.32% -47.47%
FlowStreamBuilder.kt 28.74% -2.1%
CollectionAsStream.kt 23.78% -0.72%
IAsyncNode.kt 9.09% -4.55%

}

@RequiresTransaction
fun getOrCreateHistoryIndex(repositoryId: RepositoryId, version: CLVersion): Object<HistoryIndexNode> {

Check warning

Code scanning / detekt

The function getOrCreateHistoryIndex is missing documentation. Warning

The function getOrCreateHistoryIndex is missing documentation.
@abstraktor abstraktor force-pushed the feature/history-pagination branch from 98e0cca to 0ab3554 Compare September 18, 2025 08:52
@abstraktor abstraktor marked this pull request as ready for review September 18, 2025 09:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants