Skip to content

Conversation

599316527
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @599316527, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

I've implemented a fix that enhances the flexibility of ONNX Runtime inference within the funasr_onnx utility. Previously, it wasn't possible to pass specific runtime options to the ONNX session during execution. This change introduces an optional run_options parameter to the inference call, which is then directly forwarded to the underlying ONNX Runtime session. This allows users to configure advanced execution settings, such as thread management or memory allocation, for their ONNX models.

Highlights

  • ONNX Runtime run_options: The __call__ method in funasr_onnx/utils/utils.py now accepts an optional run_options parameter.
  • ONNX Runtime Session Execution: This run_options parameter is subsequently passed directly to the self.session.run() method, allowing for custom execution options during inference.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly adds the run_options parameter to the OrtInferSession.__call__ method, allowing it to be passed to the ONNX Runtime session. The implementation is sound. I have one suggestion to add a type hint for the new parameter to improve code clarity and adhere to PEP 8 styling.

@@ -221,10 +221,10 @@ def __init__(self, model_file, device_id=-1, intra_op_num_threads=4):
RuntimeWarning,
)

def __call__(self, input_content: List[Union[np.ndarray, np.ndarray]]) -> np.ndarray:
def __call__(self, input_content: List[Union[np.ndarray, np.ndarray]], run_options = None) -> np.ndarray:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For consistency with other parameters and to improve code clarity, please add a type hint for the new run_options parameter. Using Any is appropriate here, as it's already imported from typing. This also ensures the code conforms to PEP 8 style for annotated function parameters.1

Style Guide References

Suggested change
def __call__(self, input_content: List[Union[np.ndarray, np.ndarray]], run_options = None) -> np.ndarray:
def __call__(self, input_content: List[Union[np.ndarray, np.ndarray]], run_options: Any = None) -> np.ndarray:

Footnotes

  1. PEP 8 specifies that for function parameters with annotations, there should be spaces around the = for default values (e.g., param: type = None). For unannotated parameters, there should be no spaces (e.g., param=None). Adding the type hint makes the code style consistent and correct.

@LauraGPT LauraGPT merged commit 82a07e2 into modelscope:main Aug 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants