Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on improving the robustness of data processing for the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a 'Category' column to the subset scores table in the HTML report, complete with the necessary backend, template, and internationalization changes. The logic to conditionally display this column is a good addition for improving report clarity. The PR also includes a robustness fix in evalscope/perf/plugin/datasets/kontext_bench.py to handle missing 'instruction' fields. The changes are well-implemented across the different files. I have one suggestion to improve the logic for showing the category column to make the report even cleaner by hiding redundant information.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates the perf dataset configuration and enhances the HTML evaluation report to optionally display metric categories (with i18n support), while making the kontext_bench dataset plugin more robust to missing instructions.
Changes:
- Switch perf VL test dataset from
flickr8ktokontext_bench. - Add optional “Category” column to the report subset-score table (renderer + template + i18n strings).
- Add a fallback instruction string in the
kontext_benchdataset plugin wheninstructionis missing.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| tests/perf/test_perf.py | Updates perf VL test to use kontext_bench. |
| evalscope/report/template/report.html.j2 | Conditionally renders a Category column in the subset table. |
| evalscope/report/template/js/i18n_eval.js | Adds col.category translation keys (EN/ZH). |
| evalscope/report/renderer.py | Populates per-row category and computes whether to show the Category column. |
| evalscope/perf/plugin/datasets/kontext_bench.py | Adds default instruction text if absent in dataset items. |
You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.
No description provided.