Skip to content

[train] support target_parameters #5340

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Jintao-Huang
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @Jintao-Huang, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

I've implemented support for a new target_parameters argument in the LoRA training configuration. This enhancement allows users to specify which model parameters should be targeted for LoRA adaptation directly by their names, offering an alternative to the existing target_modules and target_regex options. This change improves flexibility in fine-tuning large language models.

Highlights

  • LoRA Configuration: Introduced target_parameters to LoraConfig, enabling LoRA application based on parameter names.
  • Documentation: Updated Chinese and English documentation files to describe the new target_parameters argument and its usage, including the peft version requirement.
  • Dependency Management: Bumped the peft dependency version in requirements/framework.txt to allow versions up to <0.18, which is necessary for the new target_parameters feature.
  • Codebase Integration: Integrated the target_parameters argument across relevant swift modules, including argument parsing and adapter preparation logic for both standard and Megatron training setups.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces support for the target_parameters argument in LoRA training, which allows for more precise control over which parameters are adapted. The changes are well-implemented across the documentation, requirements, and both the standard and Megatron training paths. The peft dependency has been correctly updated to support this new feature. I have one minor suggestion to improve type hint consistency.

@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ class TunerArguments:
# tuners
target_modules: List[str] = field(default_factory=lambda: ['all-linear'])
target_regex: Optional[str] = None
target_parameters: Optional[list[str]] = None
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For consistency with other type hints in this file, such as target_modules and modules_to_save, it's better to use List[str] from the typing module instead of the built-in list[str]. This will ensure uniformity across the codebase.

Suggested change
target_parameters: Optional[list[str]] = None
target_parameters: Optional[List[str]] = None

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant