⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 223,402%
#1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 223,402% (2,234.02x) speedup for
sorterincode_to_optimize/bubble_sort_3.py⏱️ Runtime :
934 milliseconds→418 microseconds(best of184runs)📝 Explanation and details
Here's an optimized version of your code.
Major improvements.
O(n^2)), while Python's built-insortruns inO(n log n)and is highly optimized in C.arr, just usearr.sort().If you want to keep a manual fast sort (like quicksort), consider.
Why this is faster.
arrin-place and returns it.If you need a manual algorithm for educational purposes (not recommended for production), I can provide a fast implementation (e.g., using quicksort or heapsort), but for 99% of use cases, the above is best for speed and memory!
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-sorter-md0disqtand push.