-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Open
0 / 10 of 1 issue completedLabels
Description
Overview
Background: Discussed at tech meeting today. This won't be something we can tackle yet for several months, at least.
Eventually, rather than having "INCLUDED" titles be ontologized as synonyms or special properties, we would like to create new Mondo term classes for each of them.
Sub-tasks
- 1.
omim- Change ontologization to classes
- Consider if any components of the pipeline need to be tweaked. Will this have ramifications for Gene-Disease pipeline? E.g. we decided that if a gene was associated with 2+ phenotypes, but they had the same MIM, and all of them but 1 were "INCLUDED", we would keep a gene-disease association (Add disease-defining axioms where "duplicate" disease-gene assocs #185 (sheet)). We still want to do that?
- Note: ST - This is an OMIM example from an INCLUDED entry. We want to add the disease defining gene to the main OMIM term, but not the OMIM INCLUDED term even if there is a corresponding Mondo term.
- 2.
mondo-ingest: No change needed unless we want to invent a new prefix for these classes. Otherwise, slurp and subclass sync will automatically process them. - 3.
mondo: Unless new prefixes invented, also not much to do here except apply themondo-ingestpipelines and review.
Reactions are currently unavailable