Skip to content

Conversation

baileympearson
Copy link
Contributor

Description

What is changing?

Renaming the ARN we use for secrets manager so the name more accurately describes what the secret is. We use the same ARN for all secrets, not just OIDC.

Is there new documentation needed for these changes?

What is the motivation for this change?

Release Highlight

Fill in title or leave empty for no highlight

Double check the following

  • Ran npm run check:lint script
  • Self-review completed using the steps outlined here
  • PR title follows the correct format: type(NODE-xxxx)[!]: description
    • Example: feat(NODE-1234)!: rewriting everything in coffeescript
  • Changes are covered by tests
  • New TODOs have a related JIRA ticket

@baileympearson baileympearson requested a review from a team as a code owner February 7, 2025 18:17
durran
durran previously approved these changes Feb 7, 2025
@durran durran self-requested a review February 7, 2025 19:03
@durran durran dismissed their stale review February 7, 2025 19:04

EVG failures.

@durran durran self-assigned this Feb 10, 2025
@durran durran added the Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes label Feb 10, 2025
@durran durran merged commit dd9f2ce into main Feb 10, 2025
21 of 30 checks passed
@durran durran deleted the no-story-rename-ARN branch February 10, 2025 15:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants