Skip to content

Conversation

@besaleli
Copy link
Member

@besaleli besaleli commented Jan 5, 2026

No description provided.

@besaleli besaleli added this to the v0.3.0 milestone Jan 5, 2026
@besaleli besaleli self-assigned this Jan 5, 2026
@besaleli besaleli added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 5, 2026
@besaleli besaleli linked an issue Jan 5, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
@besaleli besaleli merged commit 5a970e4 into main Jan 5, 2026
3 of 4 checks passed
@besaleli besaleli deleted the 189-register-tensor-object-on-instantiation branch January 5, 2026 11:35
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 33.33333% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
encoderfile-core/src/transforms/engine/mod.rs 33.33% 4 Missing ⚠️
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
encoderfile-core/src/transforms/engine/mod.rs 85.71% <33.33%> (-3.18%) ⬇️
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 5, 2026

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #190 will not alter performance

Comparing 189-register-tensor-object-on-instantiation (f51192c) with main (f2a2995)

Summary

✅ 20 untouched
⏩ 20 skipped1

Footnotes

  1. 20 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Register Tensor object on instantiation

3 participants