feat: support backward pagination #328
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kettanaito
changed the title
take pagination teststake pagination tests
kettanaito
changed the title
take pagination tests
Member
Author
Released: v1.1.0 🎉This has been released in v1.1.0. Get these changes by running the following command: Predictable release automation by Release. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Important
The
cursorrecord is now included in the pagination results (previously excluded). Since our goal here is to align with the existing practices in ORM libraries, I treat the previous behavior as unexpected and this change as a fix to that unexpected behavior. Useskip: 1in a combination withcursorto get the previous behavior.takein pagination #324cursorin pagination #329