libraw: update to 0.22.0 #25268
Merged
libraw: update to 0.22.0 #25268
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
|
yeah, you could patch it here (_WIN32 instead of _MSC_VER): https://github.com/LibRaw/LibRaw/blob/ae32c08bfe2374c651176ecf32e07a3751697488/libraw/libraw.h#L54 and add "Cflags.private: -DLIBRAW_NODLL" to the .pc file |
Member
|
LIBRAW_WIN32_UNICODEPATHS also seems like it could be patched |
Contributor
Author
|
I might wait for the next soversion bump to do the rebuilds anyway... |
Contributor
Author
I think that one works out correctly, I remember asking to add the |
kmilos
changed the title
Contributor
Author
|
imagemagick needs a patch a la Arch. Reported upstream. |
lren
pushed a commit
to lren/MINGW-packages
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 20, 2026
* libraw: update to 0.22.0 * libraw rebuilds * imagemagick: patch for libraw 0.22
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
OTOH, it might make more sense to patch
libraw/libraw_types.hinstead of forcing clients to defineLIBRAW_WIN32_DLLDEFSas well...Thoughts?