Skip to content

Conversation

@nbittich
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@nvdk
Copy link
Member

nvdk commented Aug 25, 2023

I quite like the idea of supporting prefixes, but I think the implementation needs to be different. Rather than adding the prefixes in the sparql queries I think we need to expand the prefixes on reading the config. This might be done in https://github.com/mu-semtech/mu-search/blob/master/lib/mu_search/property_definition.rb#L10 .

This is required because we will not get prefixed predicates from delta's for example

@nvdk
Copy link
Member

nvdk commented Jun 4, 2025

@nbittich you may want to have a look at #98 and see if it works for you

@nvdk nvdk closed this Jun 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants