Skip to content

Conversation

mattip
Copy link
Collaborator

@mattip mattip commented Oct 23, 2024

The README for the repo only refers to travisCI and Appveyor. The github CI is much more prevalent these days. Reword the content to mention CI-specific content less. Also, the rackspace uploads are ancient history. Mention SPEC04 and scientific-python instead.

@mattip
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mattip commented Oct 23, 2024

TODO: check that the links are still relevant, mention cibuildwheel, and hint that projects should use that instead.

@cclauss
Copy link
Contributor

cclauss commented Oct 23, 2024

mattip and others added 2 commits October 24, 2024 20:39
Co-authored-by: Andrew Murray <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Murray <[email protected]>
@mattip
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mattip commented Oct 24, 2024

Should the README have a pointer to publishing-to-pypi?

Maybe. I view multibuild as a wheel building tool, I am not sure deploying wheels is in its scope. I left the bit about scientific-python-nightly-wheels for historic reasons, but maybe it makes sense to mention direct publishing as well. Although that link is only for github, right?

Co-authored-by: Andrew Murray <[email protected]>
@mattip
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mattip commented Oct 27, 2024

Let's put this in as-is. There is more room for improvement if someone wants to submit another PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants