Skip to content

Conversation

@andreibancioiu
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@andreibancioiu andreibancioiu self-assigned this Jul 16, 2025
@andreibancioiu andreibancioiu changed the title Set up codeql.yml Set up CodeQL Jul 16, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.21%. Comparing base (ebeafaf) to head (3ba9b56).

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##           rc/barnard     #941      +/-   ##
==============================================
- Coverage       36.23%   36.21%   -0.02%     
==============================================
  Files              87       87              
  Lines           20589    20589              
==============================================
- Hits             7460     7457       -3     
- Misses          12462    12464       +2     
- Partials          667      668       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@andreibancioiu andreibancioiu requested a review from Copilot July 16, 2025 11:24

This comment was marked as outdated.

@andreibancioiu andreibancioiu changed the base branch from master to rc/barnard July 16, 2025 11:32
@andreibancioiu andreibancioiu requested a review from Copilot July 16, 2025 11:32
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR sets up CodeQL static analysis for the repository by adding a GitHub Actions workflow configuration. CodeQL is a semantic code analysis engine that helps identify security vulnerabilities and code quality issues.

  • Adds a comprehensive CodeQL workflow that runs on push, pull requests, and on a weekly schedule
  • Configures the workflow to analyze Go code using autobuild mode
  • Includes proper permissions and error handling for the CodeQL analysis process


# Initializes the CodeQL tools for scanning.
- name: Initialize CodeQL
uses: github/codeql-action/init@v3
Copy link

Copilot AI Jul 16, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The CodeQL action is using @V3 which may not be the latest version. Consider updating to @v4 or use a specific commit hash for better security and reproducibility.

Suggested change
uses: github/codeql-action/init@v3
uses: github/codeql-action/init@v4

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
exit 1

- name: Perform CodeQL Analysis
uses: github/codeql-action/analyze@v3
Copy link

Copilot AI Jul 16, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The CodeQL analyze action is using @V3 which may not be the latest version. Consider updating to @v4 or use a specific commit hash for better security and reproducibility.

Suggested change
uses: github/codeql-action/analyze@v3
uses: github/codeql-action/analyze@v4

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@andreibancioiu andreibancioiu deleted the add-codeql branch July 16, 2025 11:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants