[ISSUE #6326]♻️Refactor topic name handling in ConsumerStateGetter for improved clarity#6327
[ISSUE #6326]♻️Refactor topic name handling in ConsumerStateGetter for improved clarity#6327rocketmq-rust-bot merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
…r improved clarity
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉! 💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥! Note 🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥. |
WalkthroughA refactoring initiative that modernizes string type handling across the RocketMQ codebase by transitioning from Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 5❌ Failed checks (4 warnings, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
⚔️ Resolve merge conflicts (beta)
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 🧹 Recent nitpick comments
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6327 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 42.62% 42.63% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 912 912
Lines 128038 128056 +18
==========================================
+ Hits 54570 54593 +23
+ Misses 73468 73463 -5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
rocketmq-rust-bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM - All CI checks passed ✅
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
Note: These are internal improvements with no visible changes to end-user functionality.