Conversation
…xsm#6332) Remove the unused commented-out `handle_get_min_offset` function stub. The actual implementation lives in `handle_get_min_offset_for_static_topic`.
WalkthroughThis pull request removes a commented-out async function Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 6✅ Passed checks (6 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
🔊@LakshmiSravya123 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉! 💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥! Note 🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6333 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 42.56% 42.57% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 913 913
Lines 128356 128356
==========================================
+ Hits 54633 54652 +19
+ Misses 73723 73704 -19 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
mxsm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@LakshmiSravya123 Thanks for your contribution. LGTM
Summary
handle_get_min_offsetfunction stub inoffset_request_handler.rshandle_get_min_offset_for_static_topicwhich is already in useCloses #6332
Summary by CodeRabbit