Reduce memory usage by scanner#649
Open
yaroslav-dudar wants to merge 1 commit intonabla-c0d3:releasefrom
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is related to #603
My assumption that the main reason of this problem is located here
sslyze/sslyze/scanner/_jobs_worker_thread.py
Line 74 in 761892b
JobsWorkerThreadpushes exception to queue which has circular reference. Exception (e variable) traceback contain frame which has exception by itself in frame locals.So I added
gc.collectin order to force garbage collection andmalloc_trimas python don't release free memory back to kernel immediatelyTest code
Results
Still minor memory grow, but significantly less than before