-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Adding several additional TryAdd methods #42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding several additional TryAdd methods #42
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Pipeline
participant Update_Dependents
alt UPDATE_DEPENDENTS is 'true'
Update_Dependents->>Pipeline: Wait before update
else UPDATE_DEPENDENTS is not 'true'
Update_Dependents->>Pipeline: Proceed without waiting
end
The sequence diagram illustrates the new conditional logic for waiting before updating dependents, showing how the pipeline behavior changes based on the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@josesimoes I updated the mscorlib reference, removed the runtime reference, and replaced the |
|
@CoryCharlton seems that you've updated the refs in this PR which is conflicting with the ones from the automated updates. Can you please rebase this PR and fix the conflicts manually? |
- Rework AZDO yaml to include job to update dependents. ***NO_CI***
- Delete file at project root. - Update path in AZDO yaml. ***NO_CI***
|
@CoryCharlton I believe I've got this right as it is. Problem seemed to be using merge instead of rebase and updating the refs here and also taking them from main... 🤪 |
josesimoes
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Thanks for this improvement.
|



Description
Motivation and Context
Exposes the same contracts as .NET Core which makes it easier to share code between projects
How Has This Been Tested?
Screenshots
Types of changes
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
waitBeforeUpdateparameter logic for dependent updates.UPDATE_DEPENDENTSvariable.