Skip to content

Conversation

@CoryCharlton
Copy link
Member

@CoryCharlton CoryCharlton commented Jan 18, 2025

Description

  • Added several TryAdd methods
  • Brought code into line with .NET Core implementation

Motivation and Context

Exposes the same contracts as .NET Core which makes it easier to share code between projects

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Local
  • Unit tests

Screenshots

Types of changes

  • Improvement (non-breaking change that improves a feature, code or algorithm)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue with code or algorithm)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality to code)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Config and build (change in the configuration and build system, has no impact on code or features)
  • Dependencies (update dependencies and changes associated, has no impact on code or features)
  • Unit Tests (add new Unit Test(s) or improved existing one(s), has no impact on code or features)
  • Documentation (changes or updates in the documentation, has no impact on code or features)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project (only if there are changes in source code).
  • My changes require an update to the documentation (there are changes that require the docs website to be updated).
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly (the changes require an update on the docs in this repo).
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have tested everything locally and all new and existing tests passed (only if there are changes in source code).
  • I have added new tests to cover my changes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated Azure Pipelines configuration to modify the waitBeforeUpdate parameter logic for dependent updates.
    • Adjusted the condition for when updates should wait based on the UPDATE_DEPENDENTS variable.

@nfbot nfbot added Type: enhancement New feature or request Type: Unit Tests labels Jan 18, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 18, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • nanoFramework.DependencyInjection/nanoFramework.DependencyInjection.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • tests/nanoFramework.DependencyInjection.UnitTests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the azure-pipelines.yml configuration file, specifically changing the logic for the waitBeforeUpdate parameter in the Update_Dependents job. The change reverses the condition for waiting before updating dependents, now waiting only when the UPDATE_DEPENDENTS variable is explicitly set to 'true'. This adjustment alters the control flow of the update process, potentially changing when and how dependent updates are triggered.

Changes

File Change Summary
azure-pipelines.yml Modified waitBeforeUpdate parameter logic in Update_Dependents job

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Pipeline
    participant Update_Dependents
    
    alt UPDATE_DEPENDENTS is 'true'
        Update_Dependents->>Pipeline: Wait before update
    else UPDATE_DEPENDENTS is not 'true'
        Update_Dependents->>Pipeline: Proceed without waiting
    end
Loading

The sequence diagram illustrates the new conditional logic for waiting before updating dependents, showing how the pipeline behavior changes based on the UPDATE_DEPENDENTS variable's value.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@CoryCharlton
Copy link
Member Author

@josesimoes I updated the mscorlib reference, removed the runtime reference, and replaced the ThrowHelper calls with ArgumentNullException this should be ready to merge.

@josesimoes
Copy link
Member

@CoryCharlton seems that you've updated the refs in this PR which is conflicting with the ones from the automated updates. Can you please rebase this PR and fix the conflicts manually?

@josesimoes
Copy link
Member

@CoryCharlton I believe I've got this right as it is. Problem seemed to be using merge instead of rebase and updating the refs here and also taking them from main... 🤪

Copy link
Member

@josesimoes josesimoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks for this improvement.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@josesimoes josesimoes merged commit 7375e3f into nanoframework:main Jan 31, 2025
7 checks passed
@CoryCharlton CoryCharlton deleted the extending_try_add branch January 31, 2025 18:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants