Skip to content

Conversation

@nfbot
Copy link
Member

@nfbot nfbot commented Apr 3, 2025

Bumps nanoFramework.Benchmark from 1.0.107 to 1.0.108

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Upgraded the benchmarking component to version 1.0.108, ensuring improved compatibility and performance.

Bumps nanoFramework.Benchmark from 1.0.107 to 1.0.108</br>
[version update]

### ⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 3, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the nanoFramework.Benchmark dependency in the nanoFramework.Hardware.Esp32.Rmt.Benchmarks/packages.lock.json file. The update changes both the requested and resolved version from 1.0.107 to 1.0.108 and revises the associated content hash.

Changes

File Change Summary
nanoFramework.Hardware.Esp32.Rmt.Benchm… Updated nanoFramework.Benchmark dependency: changed requested version from [1.0.107, 1.0.107] to [1.0.108, 1.0.108], resolved version from 1.0.107 to 1.0.108, and updated the contentHash.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update 3 NuGet dependencies #85: Updates the nanoFramework.Benchmark dependency from version 1.0.106 to 1.0.107, showing a clear progression in dependency version updates that is directly related to this PR.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7006bef and 5773d22.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • nanoFramework.Hardware.Esp32.Rmt.Benchmarks/nanoFramework.Hardware.Esp32.Rmt.Benchmarks.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.Hardware.Esp32.Rmt.Benchmarks/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • nanoFramework.Hardware.Esp32.Rmt.Benchmarks/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
nanoFramework.Hardware.Esp32.Rmt.Benchmarks/packages.lock.json (1)

7-9: Approved Dependency Version Update.

The changes correctly update the nanoFramework.Benchmark dependency by bumping the requested and resolved versions to 1.0.108 and updating the associated contentHash. This automated update appears consistent with dependency management best practices. Please ensure that downstream projects consuming this package reference are also compatible with version 1.0.108.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Apr 3, 2025

@nfbot nfbot merged commit 918bc56 into main Apr 3, 2025
6 checks passed
@nfbot nfbot deleted the nfbot/update-dependencies/f9f4a246-843d-4b87-ba13-bc2dc3e5813c branch April 3, 2025 10:09
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request May 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants