Skip to content

Conversation

@nfbot
Copy link
Member

@nfbot nfbot commented Sep 23, 2024

Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 2.1.111 to 2.1.112

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the dependency version for nanoFramework.TestFramework to enhance stability and performance.

Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 2.1.111 to 2.1.112</br>
[version update]

### ⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the dependency version for nanoFramework.TestFramework in the packages.lock.json file. The version has been changed from 2.1.111 to 2.1.112, and the content hash for the new version has also been updated to reflect this change.

Changes

File Change Summary
Tests/DataSetTests/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.TestFramework version from 2.1.111 to 2.1.112 and modified the content hash.

Possibly related PRs

  • Fix tests project build #4: Updates the packages.lock.json file to include specific versions of nanoFramework.TestFramework, related to the main PR's changes.
  • Add nuspec #3: Modifies the packages.lock.json file, indicating updates to dependencies, including nanoFramework.TestFramework, connecting it to the main PR's changes.
  • Update 1 NuGet dependencies #8: Updates the Nerdbank.GitVersioning dependency in the packages.lock.json file, relevant as it involves changes to the same file as the main PR.
  • Update 1 NuGet dependencies #10: Similar to Update 1 NuGet dependencies #8, this PR updates the Nerdbank.GitVersioning dependency in the packages.lock.json file, making it relevant to the main PR's context.

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 247535a and 77999ea.

Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • Tests/DataSetTests/DataSetTests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/DataSetTests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
Files selected for processing (1)
  • Tests/DataSetTests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
Tests/DataSetTests/packages.lock.json (1)

13-15: LGTM!

The update to the nanoFramework.TestFramework package from version 2.1.111 to 2.1.112 looks good.

As this is a minor version bump and an automated PR, it's likely a routine update with bug fixes or minor enhancements. The change is unlikely to introduce any breaking changes.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@nfbot nfbot merged commit d03c410 into main Sep 23, 2024
6 checks passed
@nfbot nfbot deleted the nfbot/update-dependencies/566670ed-8902-42cb-abb7-5cbb38503134 branch September 23, 2024 01:08
This was referenced Nov 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants