Skip to content

Conversation

@nfbot
Copy link
Member

@nfbot nfbot commented Nov 14, 2025

Bumps nanoFramework.System.Device.Wifi from 1.5.134 to 1.5.137

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated WiFi system dependencies to the latest compatible version across project configurations.

Bumps nanoFramework.System.Device.Wifi from 1.5.134 to 1.5.137</br>
[version update]

### ⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2025

Walkthrough

Updates dependency lock metadata for nanoFramework.System.Device.Wifi from version 1.5.134 to 1.5.137 across two test project lock files, with corresponding updates to requested ranges and content hashes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Dependency lock updates
TestMqtt/TestAppv5.0/packages.lock.json, Tests/MemoryLeakTestApp/packages.lock.json
Bump nanoFramework.System.Device.Wifi from 1.5.134 to 1.5.137; update requested version ranges and contentHash in both lock files

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Both changes are identical and repetitive lock file updates affecting the same dependency across two files

Possibly related PRs

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: updating NuGet dependencies, specifically nanoFramework.System.Device.Wifi across multiple package lock files.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch nfbot/update-dependencies/837edf08-6375-4778-bf8e-6c2ce0c786d0

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e7e7bb and ae66649.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
  • TestMqtt/TestAppv5.0/TestAppv5.0.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • TestMqtt/TestAppv5.0/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/MemoryLeakTestApp/MemoryLeakTestApp.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/MemoryLeakTestApp/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • TestMqtt/TestAppv5.0/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
  • Tests/MemoryLeakTestApp/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: nanoframework.m2mqtt (Build_Library)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Tests/MemoryLeakTestApp/packages.lock.json (1)

25-27: Dependency update is consistent and safe.

The patch version bump from 1.5.134 to 1.5.137 is a safe update and the metadata is correctly aligned (requested range matches resolved version, contentHash reflects the new package). This matches the corresponding update in TestMqtt/TestAppv5.0/packages.lock.json.

TestMqtt/TestAppv5.0/packages.lock.json (1)

19-21: Consistent patch update across both test projects.

Both lock files now have nanoFramework.System.Device.Wifi pinned to 1.5.137 with matching contentHash values. This patch version update is semantically safe and properly aligned. Consider running the test suite post-merge to confirm compatibility.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@nfbot nfbot merged commit 6e60bcc into main Nov 14, 2025
11 checks passed
@nfbot nfbot deleted the nfbot/update-dependencies/837edf08-6375-4778-bf8e-6c2ce0c786d0 branch November 14, 2025 00:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants