Skip to content

Comments

Add Cisco CBS350-24XT device type definition#10

Open
dondundonki wants to merge 1 commit intonautobot:mainfrom
dondundonki:cisco-cbs350-24xt
Open

Add Cisco CBS350-24XT device type definition#10
dondundonki wants to merge 1 commit intonautobot:mainfrom
dondundonki:cisco-cbs350-24xt

Conversation

@dondundonki
Copy link

Greetings!

A small PR to add CBS350-24XT.

maximum_draw: 125
allocated_draw: null
interfaces:
- name: '[te]1/0/1'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are these interfaces really named [te]? Most other 10gbase-t interfaces for Cisco in this library are TenGigabitEthernet

interfaces:
- name: '[te]1/0/1'
type: 10gbase-t
mgmt_only: false
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please remove mgmt_only: false from all non-mgmt ports? It just adds noise to the file as that is the default value.

type: 10gbase-t
mgmt_only: false
- name: '[te]1/0/21'
type: 10gbase-t
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

According to the data sheet in the link you provided in the comment, the last 4 interfaces are 10g copper/sfp combo. I think that is supposed to be 10gbase-x-sfpp?

- name: '[te]1/0/24'
type: 10gbase-t
mgmt_only: false
- name: oob
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same comment about the name as previous. I do see that we have this name also on one other device (SG550XG-24F-K9), so I'm just double checking that this is correct?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants