Skip to content

Conversation

@nejidevelops
Copy link
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade axios from 1.6.4 to 1.13.1.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 30 versions ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released 22 days ago.

Issues fixed by the recommended upgrade:

Issue Score Exploit Maturity
high severity Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
SNYK-JS-AXIOS-7361793
666 Proof of Concept
high severity Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)
SNYK-JS-BODYPARSER-7926860
666 No Known Exploit
high severity Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-JS-WS-7266574
666 Proof of Concept
high severity Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-JS-WS-7266574
666 Proof of Concept
high severity Excessive Platform Resource Consumption within a Loop
SNYK-JS-BRACES-6838727
666 Proof of Concept
high severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-CROSSSPAWN-8303230
666 Proof of Concept
high severity Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-JS-HTTPPROXYMIDDLEWARE-8229906
666 Proof of Concept
medium severity Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
SNYK-JS-AXIOS-12613773
666 Proof of Concept
medium severity Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
SNYK-JS-AXIOS-9292519
666 Proof of Concept
medium severity Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
SNYK-JS-AXIOS-9403194
666 No Known Exploit
medium severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-BABELHELPERS-9397697
666 Proof of Concept
medium severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-BABELRUNTIME-10044504
666 Proof of Concept
medium severity Cross-site Scripting (XSS)
SNYK-JS-ROLLUP-8073097
666 Proof of Concept
medium severity Cross-site Scripting (XSS)
SNYK-JS-WEBPACK-7840298
666 Proof of Concept
medium severity Cross-site Scripting (XSS)
SNYK-JS-COOKIE-8163060
666 No Known Exploit
medium severity Improper Control of Dynamically-Managed Code Resources
SNYK-JS-EJS-6689533
666 Proof of Concept
medium severity Open Redirect
SNYK-JS-EXPRESS-6474509
666 No Known Exploit
medium severity Cross-site Scripting
SNYK-JS-EXPRESS-7926867
666 No Known Exploit
medium severity Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
SNYK-JS-HTTPPROXYMIDDLEWARE-9691387
666 No Known Exploit
medium severity Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
SNYK-JS-HTTPPROXYMIDDLEWARE-9691389
666 No Known Exploit
medium severity Cross-site Scripting (XSS)
SNYK-JS-JQUERY-565129
666 Mature
medium severity Cross-site Scripting (XSS)
SNYK-JS-JQUERY-567880
666 Mature
medium severity Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
SNYK-JS-MICROMATCH-6838728
666 No Known Exploit
medium severity Improper Input Validation
SNYK-JS-NANOID-8492085
666 No Known Exploit
medium severity Improper Handling of Unexpected Data Type
SNYK-JS-ONHEADERS-10773729
666 No Known Exploit
medium severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-PATHTOREGEXP-7925106
666 Proof of Concept
medium severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-PATHTOREGEXP-7925106
666 Proof of Concept
medium severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-PATHTOREGEXP-8482416
666 Proof of Concept
low severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-BRACEEXPANSION-9789073
666 Proof of Concept
low severity Cross-site Scripting
SNYK-JS-SEND-7926862
666 No Known Exploit
low severity Cross-site Scripting
SNYK-JS-SERVESTATIC-7926865
666 No Known Exploit
low severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-BRACEEXPANSION-9789073
666 Proof of Concept
critical severity Predictable Value Range from Previous Values
SNYK-JS-FORMDATA-10841150
666 Proof of Concept
critical severity Predictable Value Range from Previous Values
SNYK-JS-FORMDATA-10841150
666 Proof of Concept
Release notes
Package name: axios from axios GitHub release notes

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade axios from 1.6.4 to 1.13.1.

See this package in npm:
axios

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/newtonombese1/project/19b6a92b-035b-448e-900c-0cc8b1ce86e5?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @nejidevelops, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, focuses on a critical dependency update for the axios library. The primary goal is to enhance the application's security posture and stability by moving to a much newer version, thereby mitigating numerous identified vulnerabilities and incorporating the latest bug fixes and features from the axios development cycle.

Highlights

  • Dependency Upgrade: The axios package has been upgraded from version 1.6.4 to 1.13.1, a jump of 30 versions, to ensure the project uses the latest stable and secure release.
  • Security Vulnerability Resolution: This upgrade addresses a significant number of security vulnerabilities across various severity levels (critical, high, medium, low), including Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF), Denial of Service (DoS), Asymmetric Resource Consumption, Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS), Cross-site Scripting (XSS), and Predictable Value Range from Previous Values.
  • New Features and Bug Fixes: The updated axios versions introduce several bug fixes, such as resolving data stream interruptions for non-OK HTTP statuses, preventing TypeErrors when config.env is undefined, and improving fetch adapter behavior. New features include HTTP/2 support and enhanced error details for low-level network issues.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly upgrades axios from version 1.6.4 to 1.13.1, addressing multiple security vulnerabilities. The change is important for the project's security. I've included one suggestion to improve the maintainability of your package.json by removing a redundant dependency declaration.

"@types/styled-components": "^5.1.11",
"auth0-js": "^9.16.2",
"axios": "^1.6.4",
"axios": "^1.13.1",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The axios package is already declared in dependencies. Including it in devDependencies as well is redundant and can be confusing. Since axios is a runtime dependency for making HTTP requests, it should only be listed in the dependencies section. Please remove it from devDependencies.

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

"axios": {
"version": "1.6.4",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/axios/-/axios-1.6.4.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-heJnIs6N4aa1eSthhN9M5ioILu8Wi8vmQW9iHQ9NUvfkJb0lEEDUiIdQNAuBtfUt3FxReaKdpQA5DbmMOqzF/A==",

P1 Badge Update lockfile to match axios version bump

The commit raises axios to ^1.13.1 in package.json, but the lockfile still pins axios to 1.6.4. Any build that uses npm ci (common in CI) will either fail because the lockfile does not satisfy package.json or, worse, will continue installing 1.6.4, leaving the vulnerability unpatched. Regenerate package-lock.json so the dependency graph reflects the new version.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants