Skip to content

Conversation

@rsill-neo4j
Copy link
Contributor

@rsill-neo4j rsill-neo4j commented Jul 15, 2024

Various queries in the Cypher Quick Reference are formatted differently.
I wasn't sure which way is preferable, so i did not change anything, but it's something to keep in mind during a review

@rsill-neo4j rsill-neo4j marked this pull request as ready for review August 26, 2024 07:46
@JPryce-Aklundh JPryce-Aklundh merged commit dc20574 into dev Oct 31, 2024
4 checks passed
@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

neo-technology-commit-status-publisher commented Oct 31, 2024

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

@JPryce-Aklundh JPryce-Aklundh deleted the include-statements-for-functions-section branch October 31, 2024 11:04
@JPryce-Aklundh JPryce-Aklundh restored the include-statements-for-functions-section branch October 31, 2024 11:04
JPryce-Aklundh added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
Various queries in the Cypher Quick Reference are formatted differently.
I wasn't sure which way is preferable, so i did not change anything, but
it's something to keep in mind during a review

---------

Co-authored-by: Jens Pryce-Åklundh <[email protected]>
JPryce-Aklundh added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
Various queries in the Cypher Quick Reference are formatted differently.
I wasn't sure which way is preferable, so i did not change anything, but
it's something to keep in mind during a review

---------

Co-authored-by: Jens Pryce-Åklundh <[email protected]>
@stefano-ottolenghi stefano-ottolenghi deleted the include-statements-for-functions-section branch July 7, 2025 08:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants