-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
Document LET
#1207
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document LET
#1207
Changes from 5 commits
02d3035
8b2dd89
5d6c2dd
6751c95
58a42a4
16ab50c
05eff7c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -35,21 +35,26 @@ The returned expressions may all be aliased using `AS`. | |
| |=== | ||
| | Clause | Description | ||
|
|
||
| m| xref::clauses/return.adoc[RETURN ... [AS]] | ||
| | Defines what to include in the query result set. | ||
|
|
||
| m| xref::clauses/with.adoc[WITH ... [AS]] | ||
| | Allows query parts to be chained together, piping the results from one to be used as starting points or criteria in the next. | ||
|
|
||
| m| xref::clauses/unwind.adoc[UNWIND ... [AS]] | ||
| | Expands a list into a sequence of rows. | ||
| m| xref::clauses/let.adoc[LET] | ||
| | Assigns expressions to variables. | ||
|
||
| label:new[Introduced in Neo4j 2025.03] | ||
|
|
||
| m| xref::clauses/filter.adoc[FILTER] | ||
| | Adds filters to queries. | ||
| label:new[Introduced in Neo4j 2025.03] | ||
|
||
|
|
||
| m| xref::clauses/finish.adoc[FINISH] | ||
| | Defines a query to have no result. | ||
|
|
||
| m| xref::clauses/return.adoc[RETURN ... [AS]] | ||
| | Defines what to include in the query result set. | ||
|
|
||
| m| xref::clauses/unwind.adoc[UNWIND ... [AS]] | ||
| | Expands a list into a sequence of rows. | ||
|
|
||
| m| xref::clauses/with.adoc[WITH ... [AS]] | ||
| | Allows query parts to be chained together, piping the results from one to be used as starting points or criteria in the next. | ||
|
|
||
| |=== | ||
|
|
||
| [[reading-sub-clauses]] | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just FYI: There is a caveat to this, since there is a sub-functionality which we do not support, cf. Appendix of the CIP. However, that is much in the detail and other implementation do not support that either. Additionally, I am trying to make this bit optional in the standard. Bottom line: I would not change anything here at this point, but we may want to in the future (e.g. when making it optional in the standard fails).