Added relationship PBAC to the Deprecations, additions, and compatibility page #1239
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
HannesSandberg
added
team-cypher-operations
ikwattro
reviewed
Apr 10, 2025
| ---- | ||
| [source, cypher, role=noheader] | ||
| ---- | ||
| GRANT TRAVERSE ON GRAPH * FOR ()-[r:Knows]-() WHERE r.classification IS NULL TO regularUsers |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think the examples could follow the neo4j syntax recommendations https://neo4j.com/docs/cypher-manual/current/syntax/naming/#_recommendations :KNOWS
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just out of curiosity, do you know why the naming convention is camel-case for labels and uppercase for relationship types?
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's a good question :) I don't have the answer.
Hunterness
reviewed
Apr 11, 2025
modules/ROOT/pages/deprecations-additions-removals-compatibility.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/ROOT/pages/deprecations-additions-removals-compatibility.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/ROOT/pages/deprecations-additions-removals-compatibility.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Hunterness
approved these changes
Apr 14, 2025
renetapopova
approved these changes
Apr 15, 2025
Contributor
renetapopova
left a comment
renetapopova
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good. Just a minor suggestion.
modules/ROOT/pages/deprecations-additions-removals-compatibility.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…ty.adoc Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <[email protected]>
renetapopova
added a commit
to neo4j/docs-operations
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2025
This PR handles the Deprecations, additions, and compatibility page. neo4j/docs-cypher#1239 --------- Co-authored-by: Hannes Sandberg <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Therese Magnusson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <[email protected]>
Contributor
Author
|
@renetapopova should I merge this now? |
Collaborator
|
Thanks for the documentation updates. The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it. |
JPryce-Aklundh
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2025
…lity page (#1239) Documentation for the feature is in this PR: neo4j/docs-operations#2255 --------- Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jens Pryce-Åklundh <[email protected]>
NataliaIvakina
pushed a commit
to NataliaIvakina/docs-cypher
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2025
…lity page (neo4j#1239) Documentation for the feature is in this PR: neo4j/docs-operations#2255 --------- Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jens Pryce-Åklundh <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Documentation for the feature is in this PR: neo4j/docs-operations#2255